Local radio announced today that the switch-off date for analogue TV broadcasts in the Oxfordshire/Buckinghamshire area has now been set; and its only a year or so away. We all knew it was on the way, but now it’s been scheduled, it brings a new level of immediacy to the issue.
I recently removed a big flat screen TV from my living room, and replaced it with my previous TV – a 21″ CRT. Why? Well, for several reasons.
1) The TV was huge, too big for my living room really. It kind of took over, and reduced the relaxation element I wanted my living room to have. I guess its okay as a wall-screen; but I don’t want a wall-screen, I want a television.
2) Its in-built freeview box didn’t receive all channels properly. New equipment… and less reliable!
3) In order to differentiate TV from Cinema, I wanted to re-instate the 4:3 aspect ratio I associate with Television as a format. Okay, so almost everything is made in 16:9 these days… so i’m not going to see the image as the director intended… I’ve heard this argument over and over again, and yes, it is a good point.
But just because new programming is produced in 16:9, this does not mean that I am going to automatically consume all this new programming. Most of the TV programming made nowdays is total rubbish; and I can watch all those old eposodes of Star Trek, Jeeves & Wooster, Bugs, Allo Allo and Dr Who with a frame proportional to the image, which actually improves my viewing experience for these programs.
But then there’s films. They’ve been made in wider than 16:9 for years. But do I really want to create the cinema experience in my living room? In all truth, I do not. It’s a living room, not a cinema. We have been brainwashed to believe that we must constantly purchase the latest consumable electronics, in order to consume the latest media products. But actually, this is a choice we have; no one is making us do this. If I want to see a film in widescreen, I will go to the cinema.
I could go on here to discuss the adoption of 16:9 aspect ratio monitors by computers, and the remediation of the cinema format into the internet, but this is a parallel debate. This post is about the end of Terrestrial TV.
One question we could ask is, is Freeview BETTER than analogue? And despite all the hype, the answer clearly has to be, no. Have you ever tried watching a rainy scene on Film-4, and noticed the screen become a series of digital blocks? Okay, so BBC1 has a higher transmission bandwidth, but still, the images display compression artifacts, which you clearly see if you know what you’re looking for. And for one, I prefer slight RF noise in the image, which is far nearer to the equivalent of ‘film grain’ than the compressed digital equivalent.
There are certain Freeview boxes on the market, which will output an RF signal to the TV, rather than just a SCART connection. This is intended for TV’s with only an RF (ariel) input, and adds an RF-type noise to the image. I could go one stage further, and delete all channels apart from 1-5, in order to create a more retro tv viewing experience (although I have not done this yet, I admit).
And to add to the retro experience, I have re-instated a VHS VCR into th set-up, allowing me to carry on recording on VHS tape. Okay, so VHS degrades… but so does the surface of those DVD-recordable discs we have all now archived to.
When VHS degrades, the image picture deteriates; when DVD-R’s degrade, they become unreadable.